sábado, 18 de abril de 2009

Criteria and Validity (Chapter 8)

The learning process is full of important concepts which some of them help the learner to be aware of his/her performances, challenges, results and how they are progressing throughout this process. In Chapter 8 we can find two important concepts such as criteria, understanding and validity to explain how the learner is performing and how effective the assessments are.

After a test every teacher should assess and evaluate the students’ performance, which should always need to be based on a judgment supported by criteria. A good criteria focus on the deep issues of a piece of work more than on the first thing you see like grammar and length. Although, criteria importantly need to specify what the purpose of the test is and what are the main points to assess, it is to say that it is important to base the criteria on the main objectives of a work. Moreover, that is why with every piece of work teachers give to students it is important to have rubrics which will always support the teachers’ power of assessment and surely make this work of assessing easily.

Referring to rubrics we can describe them as Wiggins says in Chapter 8 “Rubrics describe degrees of quality, proficiency, or understanding along a continuum”. There exists two types of rubrics, holistic and analytic, where the holistic rubric is used to give a judgment of the students’ performance and it gives a general impression of it. On the other hand, analytic rubric have two ways to judge the students’ performance separately by dividing it by traits. It is important to highlight the representation of a descriptive rubric of criterion which is really analytic and allows us to give a score with evidences.

The chapter 8 also allows us to be conscious about the understanding. It says that understanding is a process which does not depend on right and wrong answers. If we focus on the assessment of understanding, it is necessary to create a rubric based on concrete ideas to assess which should go beyond the first look at the work like. A rubric is not complete until to have a deep analysis of the work identifying the main ideas of the author and may be go deeply in what are the really intentions of him/her and why express each idea in the way he/she does. It also necessary to clarify that each learner has a different point of view t see and understand things.
Validity is present in this chapter reviewed as the way to gain the results of a work based on concrete evidence. Some teachers base their corrections of tests or exams only in the precision of the answers than in the process students use to solve the problem. When students’ results of a test are good according to the teacher expectations and those expectations are based on just the precise answers as a book says, it does not really mean that the students understand. The idea here is to know how students go to gain that information and how they express it in their own words providing critical thinking.

In conclusion, students’ performances will depend on the process of assessment based on valid rubrics and a continuous understanding. Besides, the process of understanding goes accompanied with mental development.

8 comentarios:

  1. I agree with you when you said that teachers should assess and evaluate the students’ performance and that should always need to be based on a judgment supported by criteria. It is important for teachers to know how important their criteria is when they deside how valid a test is. Good!!!

    ResponderEliminar
  2. Is some teachers base the correction of tests or exams only in the precision of the answer, as you say, this is may be because they are marking an objective test, which is very possible. But I think I get your point, it is necessary that teachers had rubrics with the appropriate criteria in order to let students know the reasons why they are given X mark and they weaknesses and the strenghs they have as well.

    ResponderEliminar
  3. I totally agree with you javiera when you talk about the importance of criteria!I think that most of the students could have a better performance if they know how the teacher is really going to evaluate and what she is really expecting from them

    ResponderEliminar
  4. you are completely right in your comment about criteria and validity. It is important that teachers base their judgement of students within reliable parameters. So students can see a real validity in the results. doing this criteria, students can feel more confident when they are assessed.

    ResponderEliminar
  5. Well, I agree when you specify the importance of having clear rubrics to evaluate. The more clear they are the fairer you will be with your students.

    ResponderEliminar
  6. Validity is based on evidence that help teachers to be more precise in their teaching. As you have mentioned teachers need to use more complex parameters to measure students than books answers, it is very common to see teachers using a book to analyse students' processes.

    ResponderEliminar
  7. I think it's true when Wiggins says that understanding is a process which does not depend on right and wrong answers, because they do not reflect if students really learned.

    ResponderEliminar
  8. Creo que la diferencia entre las dos rúbricas es importante acá. Entre las dos, holística y analítica, prefiero la rúbrica analítica por lo que dices, que nos da la oportunidad de evaluar a los estudiantes con una nota que tiene evidencia. La retroalimentación ya existen en una rúbrica analítica, y es muy específica – los estudiantes entienden bien exactamente por qué están recibiendo su nota.

    ResponderEliminar